Transportation in Europe

Trains vs. Planes in Europe

(Which Should You Take? A Traveler’s Survival Guide)

---

The Big Picture

Both trains and planes will get you across Europe. The real question is: do you want speed and airports, or scenery and sandwiches? Here’s the breakdown.

---

1. Speed

• Trains: High-speed services like the TGV, AVE, or ICE hit 300 km/h, making Paris → Lyon (2 hrs) or Madrid → Barcelona (3 hrs) a breeze. Regional trains, however, may take longer than medieval horse-drawn carts.
• Planes: If you count only “airborne” time, planes win. Paris → Rome in under 2 hours. But add airport transfers, security lines, boarding, and baggage claim, and suddenly that “2-hour flight” eats up half your day.

Winner: Planes (long distances), Trains (short/medium).

---

2. Convenience

• Trains: Stations are downtown. You stroll in, hop aboard, and within minutes you’re gliding out of the city. Security is minimal, and boarding takes 5 minutes, not 50.
• Planes: Airports are often far, far away. “Frankfurt Hahn” is closer to Belgium than Frankfurt. Security adds drama, and boarding is a Hunger Games event.

Winner: Trains.

---

3. Cost

• Trains: Prices range from dirt-cheap (regional tickets, rail passes) to eye-watering (last-minute high-speed fares). Book early or get a Eurail/Interrail pass for flexibility.
• Planes: Budget airlines dangle €20 fares. But then they slap you with luggage fees, seat fees, and breathing fees. Still, even with add-ons, flying can be cheaper for long hauls.

Winner: Planes (if you pack light and read the fine print).

---

4. Comfort

• Trains: Stretch your legs, walk to the dining car, stare at castles. No seatbelt sign, no turbulence, and bathrooms you can actually stand up in.
• Planes: Tiny seats, pressure headaches, and the ever-present mystery of who reclines during a short flight. Upside: the view above the clouds can be magical.

Winner: Trains.

---

5. Scenery

• Trains: Vineyards, mountains, lakes, medieval villages—basically a moving travel documentary. Some routes (Switzerland, Norway, Scotland) are worth the ticket price alone.
• Planes: Clouds, clouds, more clouds. Occasionally, you’ll spot the Alps from above, which is cool. But usually? Just clouds.

Winner: Trains (by a mile).

---

6. Flexibility

• Trains: Missed your train? Catch the next one—especially with regional services. With a pass, you can change plans mid-day.
• Planes: Missed your flight? Sorry, buy a new ticket. Budget airlines are especially unforgiving.

Winner: Trains.

---

7. Environmental Karma

• Trains: Trains are far greener, with a fraction of the carbon footprint. Sleep well knowing Greta approves.
• Planes: Short-haul flights are climate villains. Some countries (like France) are even phasing them out when trains are a reasonable alternative.

Winner: Trains.

---

8. Chaos Factor

• Trains: Delays happen (looking at you, Deutsche Bahn), but you’re usually still comfortable while waiting. Strikes in France or Italy add extra spice.
• Planes: Delays, cancellations, lost luggage, endless queues. Airports are like casinos: once you’re in, you lose all sense of time and money.

Winner: Trains (but with an asterisk).

---

Quick Comparison Table

Factor	Trains 🚆	Planes ✈️	Winner
Speed	Fast, but not for long trips	Super fast in the air	✈️
Convenience	Downtown stations	Remote airports + security	🚆
Cost	Affordable with planning	Dirt cheap (watch fees)	✈️
Comfort	Spacious, easy to move	Cramped, turbulence	🚆
Scenery	Europe in HD out the window	Clouds, maybe Alps	🚆
Flexibility	Easy to change plans	Strict, no mercy	🚆
Environmental Impact	Low CO₂, eco-friendly	Carbon guilt trip	🚆
Chaos Factor	Mild (delays, strikes)	High (queues, cancellations)	🚆

Verdict:

• Take trains for short/medium distances, scenery, and sanity.
• Take planes for long hauls, if time is tight, or if Ryanair’s €15 ticket is too good to resist (and you enjoy living dangerously).